Criteria
Highly Effective
Effective
Not Effective
Not Present
Thesis
Develop a defensible thesis in response to the essential question. Identify multiple claims as part of the thesis.
The claim is precise and thoughtful and clearly outlines major reasons to address the topic.
The claim takes a clear position on the topic and outlines the major reasons used to address the topic.
The claim is identifiable, but may not outline the reasons or the included reasons are weak.
There is no thesis/claim given in the paper.
Evidence from Sources
Does the student use and cite the sources in support of the thesis?
Student uses at least five sources. Student properly cites sources using footnotes in Chicago Style.
Majority of textual evidence from sources are accurately used. Insightful grouping of sources to corroborate or contradict each other when appropriate. Sources are properly cited.
Textual evidence is accurately used. Some sources corroborate or contradict each other when appropriate. Sources are cited.
Sources are mentioned, but are described and briefly discussed, and some may be inaccurate. Sources may be partially cited.
There are few to no sources mentioned, most are inaccurate, and they are not cited.
Analysis and Application
(Evidence - Sourcing Credibility)
(Synthesis)
Does the student show logical reasoning? Does the student use sourcing information to analyze meaning, perspective, and reliability? Does the student appropriately address opposing claims?
Exceptionally explains and elaborates the significance and or context of the evidence and how it supports the arguments and the claim. Sourcing when appropriate identifies the most information about the context of the source and uses that information to understand and analyze its meaning, perspective, and reliability to strengthen the argument. Acknowledges and effectively rebutes opposing claims and conflicting evidence by pointing out limitations or by making concessions or refutations over the course of the paper. Effectively uses few quotations to further the argument and quotations are integrated and explained in the paper.
Explains and elaborates the significance and or context of the evidence and how it supports the arguments and the claim. Sourcing identifies information about the source’s origin and attempts to use this information to support the argument by considering meaning, perspective, and or reliability. Acknowledges and addresses opposing claims and some conflicting evidence over the course of the paper. Uses few quotes to support the argument and explains purpose for quotes in the paper.
Attempts to explain the significance and or context of evidence and how it supports the claim but analysis is unclear. Sourcing when appropriate sometimes identifies the origins of sources , but does not yet use the information to demonstrate and understanding of the meaning, perspective, and reliability of the sources themselves. Does not acknowledge and opposing claim or conflicting evidence. Uses quotes without supporting their purpose in the paper.
There are no attempts to explain the significance or put the argument within its correct historical context. The information is confusing and does not support the argument. Either uses quotes which are irrelevant and unsupportive to the argument.
Historical Context
Does the student contextualize arguments using historic content specific language? Historical information is substantial, accurate, and interwoven in support of the argument. Relevant content vocabulary is interwoven into the argument.
Relevant historical information is substantial, relevant, accurate, and interwoven to support the argument. Use of relevant content vocabulary is accurately interwoven in the argument.
Relevant historical information is accurate and supports the argument. Contains accurate and relevant content vocabulary.
Little relevant historical information is included. May not connect to the argument or may contain fatal errors. Use of content vocabulary is attempted, but may not be accurate or may not support the argument.
No relevant historical information is included. Contains many fatal errors in argument and content use. Does not use any relevant historical vocabulary to support the argument.
Organization and Grammar
Does the student write coherent claim/thesis, body paragraphs, and conclusion? Does the student use language appropriate to the audience, purpose and context?
Maintains a formal tone throughout and there is excellent control of language techniques and sentences. Transitional words and phrases are used fluidly and elegantly to connect ideas. Few to no grammatical errors in usage, spelling, and punctuation. Paper includes an introduction, thesis/claim, body paragraphs, and conclusion.
Maintains a formal tone with minor inconsistencies. There is good control of language techniques and sentences. Transitional words and phrases are used logically to connect ideas. Some errors in grammar, usage, spelling, and punctuation, but these do not interfere with meaning. Paper includes an introduction, thesis/claim, body paragraphs, and conclusion.
Tone is informal and inconsistent and or language/ sentence formation is unclear and difficult to understand. Traditional words or either missing or sometimes used incorrectly. Many grammar usage, spelling, punctuation errors make the paper difficult to read and understand.
Paper not turned in.
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Example 1 - Research Paper Rubric
The central purpose or argument is not consistently clear throughout the paper. The purpose or argument is generally unclear. Content. Balanced presentation of relevant and legitimate information that clearly supports a central purpose or argument and shows a thoughtful, in-depth analysis of a significant topic. Reader gains important insights.
the paper. Paper contains a "roadmap" for the reader. There is a logical flow to the topics/arguments. Conclusion follows clearly from the arguments presented. Thesis is clear and ap-propriate. Thesis fairly well sup-ported. Paper is fairly well orga-nized. Conclusion follows from the rest of the paper. Thesis is fairly clear. Inconsistent ...
Research Paper Grading Rubric. For your research paper, every component of the entire assignment (outline, drafts, etc.) is subdivided into two grading schemes: content and presentation. 70% of the allotted points for the assignment are for the content of your submission, and 30% is for the presentation of the content.
Introduction 12 points. Demonstrates that student has outstanding understanding of the research subject matter. Provides the reader with the necessary information to understand the present study. Piques the readers interest and makes the importance of the question real. Gives appropriate information to previous studies that has an impact on the ...
The C paper. Adequate but weaker and less effective, possibly responding less well to assignment. Presents central idea in general terms, often depending on platitudes or cliches. Usually does not acknowledge other views. Shows basic comprehension of sources, perhaps with lapses in understanding.
Final Research Paper Rubric(s) Please make sure to submit the final draft of your final research paper in print as well as digitally and have this rubric stapled to the final draft when you submit it. No (0) Not really (0.5) Somewhat (1.0) Mostly (1.5) Completely (2.0) Does your research paper include a proper heading, a strong title, and your
Grading Rubric: Final Research Paper Anthropology. Distribution of paper grade determined by the five key components of a paper: Thesis and Motive (20%). Thesis: the paper's main arguments presented clearly in the introduction and evolving throughout the paper. Motive: why the paper's key question(s) and thesis are interesting and important ...
Rubrics are tools for communicating grading criteria and assessing student progress. Rubrics take a variety of forms, from grids to checklists, and measure a range of writing tasks, from conceptual design to sentence-level considerations. As with any assessment tool, a rubric's effectiveness is entirely dependent upon its design and its ...
Rubric for Evaluating the Final Research Paper Final Research Paper The final research paper is 10-12 pages (3200 - 3850 words, excluding reference list, abstract, and title page) and incorporates feedback from the drafting process. Elements Points Content Title Page Abstract and Key Words /5 Effectively summarizes research paper (between 130 ...
A complete analytic rubric for a research paper can be downloaded here. In WIM courses, this language should be revised to name specific disciplinary conventions. Conclusion. Whichever type of rubric you write, your goal is to avoid pushing students into prescriptive formulas and limiting thinking (e.g., "each paragraph has five sentences").
Final Dissertation Paper Rubric
The paper identifies the topic, purpose, and focus of the inquiry and explains why further investigation of the topic is needed. 4 . The paper articulates the significance of the topic of inquiry by connecting it to the larger discipline, field, and/or scholarly community. It defines its scope by specifying the parameters, limits, or
Research Paper Grading Rubric. For your research paper, every component of the entire assignment (outline, drafts, etc.) is subdivided into two grading schemes: content and presentation. 70% of the allotted points for the assignment are for the content of your submission, and 30% is for the presentation of the content.
Final Research Paper & Annotated Bibliography Rubric . Below is the rubric for your final research paper and its annotated bibliography. Aside from the points awarded for each section of the rubric, I will give one point for a correct heading (as per the syllabus) on your paper. Please submit both a digital and a hard copy of your
Holistic scoring is a quick method of evaluating a composition based on the reader's general impression of the overall quality of the writing—you can generally read a student's composition and assign a score to it in two or three minutes. Holistic scoring is usually based on a scale of 0-4, 0-5, or 0-6.
Rubric Best Practices, Examples, and Templates
Example 9 - Original Research Project Rubric
Grading Rubric for Research Paper (150 Points Possible) 1. 20 Points for submitting the final draft on time, i.e., prior to the due date and time. 2. No title (-10 points) -- Lose 10 points for not having a title. Title should be specific for your paper. Generic titles such as "Cap and Trade Research Paper" are not acceptable. 3.
Figure 1: Research Paper Rubric EXPERT PROFICIENT APPRENTICE NOVICE INTEGRATION OF KNOWLEDGE the writer's own insights. The paper demonstrates that the author fully understands and has applied concepts learned in the course. Concepts are integrated into The writer provides concluding remarks that show analysis and synthesis of ideas.
• Begins by giving an overview of the paper's topic and its main arguments (10 pts) _____ • Describes what research you conducted and included in the body of the paper (10 pts) _____ • Mentions what kind of sources you used (10 pts) _____ • States your major findings, arguments, and conclusions (10 pts) _____
Rubric Final Research Paper 2; Research Paper Rubic. 2020-2021 Modern World History Research Paper Rubric . Criteria. Highly Effective. Effective. Not Effective. Not Present. Thesis . Develop a defensible thesis in response to the essential question. Identify multiple claims as part of the thesis.
Research Presentation Rubrics