, , , and
spp., spp., , , spp., and
Plants are exposed to diverse microorganisms in their natural habitat, including bacteria, fungi, algae, and protozoa. The majority of these microorganisms occur in the soil’s rhizosphere in various types of association, some as free-living organisms, while others associate with plant roots or even live within root or shoot tissues as endophytes [ 26 , 27 ]. In the instance of a symbiotic relationship with nitrogen-fixing bacteria in the root nodules of leguminous plants, these connections may be advantageous to the plant, while others may be parasitic, pathogenic, or have no known effect on plant growth or development [ 27 ]. Microorganisms that promote plant growth are involved in a variety of biotic activities in the soil ecosystem to keep it dynamic and sustainable for crop production [ 28 ]. They colonize plant roots competitively and improve plant growth through a variety of mechanisms, including phosphate solubilization [ 29 ]; nitrogen fixation [ 30 ]; production of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), siderophores [ 31 ], 1-amino-cyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) deaminase, and hydrogen cyanate [ 32 ]; degradation of environmental pollutants; and the production of hormones, antibiotics, and lytic enzymes [ 33 ]. Furthermore, some plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria may be able to stimulate additional particular plant growth-promoting properties, such as heavy metal detoxification, salinity tolerance, and biological control of phytopathogens and insects [ 34 ].
Desulfovibrio , Rhodospirillum , and Rhodopseudomonas are examples of beneficial microbes that create symbiotic partnerships with plants, exchanging carbon-based photo-assimilates for minerals ingested by the microbe. Plant and soil biologists have paid extensive attention to beneficial symbiotic microorganisms in recent years, with major goals being the identification and adoption of new, environmentally beneficial lines of plant growth-promoting (PGP) microorganisms. Plant growth stimulators have also been found in other biostimulators, such as those found in seaweed extracts or decomposed vegetation [ 26 ].
There are different mechanisms by which plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria stimulate the growth of plants. They are widely classified as direct or indirect mechanisms [ 35 ]. Moreover, depending on their association with the plants, plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria are grouped as both symbiotic bacteria and free-living rhizobacteria [ 35 ]. Examples of plant growth-promoting bacteria include the free-living bacteria which form distinct symbiotic relationships with plants, endophytic bacteria which colonize some portions of plant tissue, and cyanobacteria [ 35 ]. Despite the differences that exist among the bacteria, they all show a similar type of mechanism while promoting bacterial growth [ 35 ]. The bacteria may use one of two methods to promote plant growth by (i) directly by improving resource acquisition or changing the plant’s hormone levels, or (ii) indirectly by lowering the inhibitory effects of various pathogenic agents on plant growth and development ( Figure 1 ).
Mechanisms of plant growth-promoting rhizobia.
3.1.1. facilitating resource acquisition.
Biofertilizer aids in nitrogen fixation, iron sequestration, and phosphate solubilization, allowing plants to use these complex organic molecules.
One of the most important nutrients for plant growth is nitrogen. Although our atmosphere contains around 80% gaseous nitrogen, green plants are unable to utilize it directly [ 36 ]. Biological nitrogen fixation is the conversion of atmospheric nitrogen to ammonia by soil-borne microbes. About 175 × 10 6 tons of nitrogen are fixed globally each year by nitrogen-fixing bacteria [ 37 ]. Biological nitrogen fixation is a critical component of microbial activities. Only prokaryotes, which can be symbiotic or free-living in nature, are able to produce the nitrogenase enzyme to fix nitrogen biologically. The enzyme nitrogenase catalyzes biological nitrogen fixation. Some soil bacteria and blue-green algae can convert nitrogen from the air into ammonia in their cells. Diazotrophy, or nitrogen fixation, is the process of nitrogen reduction [ 29 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 ]. N-fixers, also known as diazotrophs, are microbes that reduce atmospheric nitrogen. Plants can directly utilize the ammonia produced during nitrogen fixation.
The Rhizobiaceae (α-proteobacteria) are a family of symbiotic N 2 -fixing rhizobacteria that live in a symbiotic association with leguminous plant roots. This relationship necessitates a complicated interaction between the host and the symbiont, which leads to the creation of nodules that house the rhizobia as an intracellular symbiont [ 41 ]. The rhizobia include Rhizobium , Bradyrhizobium , Sinorhizobium , Azorhizobium , and Mesorhizobium as a group. Rhizobacteria that fix nitrogen in non-leguminous plants are known as non-symbiotic rhizobacteria. They are also known as diazotrophs, and they can create a non-obligate relationship with their hosts [ 42 ]. The nitrogen fixation process is carried out by nitrogenase, a complex enzyme structure that includes dinitrogenase reductase, which has iron (Fe) as a cofactor, and dinitrogenase, which has iron (Fe) and molybdenum (Mo) as cofactors [ 39 ]. In Figure 2 , dinitrogenase reductase produces electrons and uses them to decrease N 2 to NH 3 [ 43 ]. Mo-nitrogenase, V-nitrogenase, and Fe-nitrogenase are three different nitrogenase complexes based on changes in the cofactor of dinitrogenase [ 40 , 44 , 45 ]. N 2 fixation genes, also known as Nif genes, are found in both symbiotic and free-living nitrogen-fixing microorganisms [ 44 ]. Nif genes are structural genes involved in Fe–protein activation, Fe–Mo cofactor biosynthesis, electron donation, and serve as regulatory genes required for enzymatic synthesis and activity [ 45 ]. Despite being a negative regulator of Nif gene expression, oxygen is required for Rhizobium sp. bacteroid respiration [ 46 ]. Because bacterial leghemoglobin has a high affinity for oxygen, it can keep the enzyme active even in the absence of oxygen ( Figure 2 ). To efficiently pursue the nitrogen fixation process, sufficient O 2 supply to the bacteroid for respiration must occur concurrently with prevention of the O 2 supply to the nitrogenase enzyme complex. The simplest way to accomplish this objective is to use genetic engineering to introduce bacterial hemoglobin (Hb) that binds O 2 to the rhizobacteria [ 47 ]. Following this strategy, it was discovered that after transforming Rhizobium etli with the Hb gene of Vitreoscilla sp. (a Gram-negative bacterium), the rhizobial cells had a two- to threefold faster respiration rate than non-transformed rhizobial cells [ 30 ]. Because Vitreoscilla sp. has Hb-producing genes, inserting this gene into rhizobial cells resulted in Hb production in the transformed cells. Despite the low availability of O 2 , the Hb generated in this way could bind to it with a high affinity. When the altered Rhizobium was inoculated to bean plants, the plants had 68% greater nitrogenase activity than plants inoculated with wild-type R. etli . The resulting seeds had a 25–30% increase in leaf content and a 16% rise in nitrogen content as a result of this change [ 48 ].
Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria’s molecular N 2 fixing mechanism. The nitrogen fixation process is carried out by the nitrogenase enzyme complex, which comprises dinitrogenase reductase and dinitrogenase. Dinitrogenase reductase produces electrons, which dinitrogenase uses to convert N 2 to NH 3 . Because the enzyme complex can attach to O 2 and become inactive, oxygen is a powerful inhibitor. Bacterial leghemoglobin, on the other hand, has a higher affinity for oxygen and hence binds to free oxygen more effectively. As a result, the presence of leghemoglobin protects the nitrogenase enzyme complex from oxygen, keeping it active [ 16 ].
Nodule development is another key component of Rhizobium . To accommodate the symbiotic bacteria Rhizobium , most bean plants generate root lateral organs de novo, known as “root nodules”. Symbiotic bacterial infection of the legume plant stimulates the creation of new organs, such as nodules, by altering the fate of differentiated cortical cells [ 49 ]. To establish optimal nodule development, two regulatory events, bacterial infection and nodule organogenesis, must be coordinated in the epidermis and cortical cells, respectively, during this process [ 50 ]. The symbiotic reactions between the host legume plants and Rhizobium are sustained by nodulation factors (Nod factors), which are lipochitin oligosaccharides released by rhizobia [ 51 ]. Plant ethylene levels were found to be higher after Rhizobium sp. infection of legumes, and this higher ethylene concentration inhibited further rhizobial infection and nodule development [ 16 ]. By producing a small compound molecule called “rhizobitoxine”, some rhizobial strains can enhance the number of nodules formed on the host bean plant’s roots by restricting the rise in ethylene production [ 52 ].
Rhizobitoxine is a phytotoxin that inhibits ethylene biosynthesis by chemically inhibiting the enzyme 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) synthase [ 53 ]. ACC deaminase is an enzyme produced by some rhizobial strains that eliminates some of the ACC (the immediate precursor to ethylene in plants) before it is converted to ethylene. The plant’s nodule production and biomass increase by 25–40% as a result of this reduction [ 54 ]. Because around 1–10% of rhizobial strains in the field naturally contain ACC deaminase, it is possible to improve the nodulation effectiveness of rhizobia strains without ACC deaminase by genetically engineering them with rhizobia ACC deaminase genes [ 3 ]. The introduction of an ACC deaminase gene from Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viciae into the chromosomal DNA of a Sinorhizobium meliloti strain that lacked this enzyme enhanced nodule numbers by 35% and host alfalfa plant biomass by 40% compared with the wild-type control strain [ 30 , 48 ]. Azorhizobium is a stem nodule-forming symbiotic bacterium that forms stem nodules and fixes N 2 , among other Rhizobium strains [ 55 ]. They also make a large amount of indole acetic acid (IAA), which helps plants thrive. Bradyrhizobium is a good nitrogen fixer, and when it was inoculated into Mucuna seeds, it boosted total organic carbon, N 2 , P, and K levels in the soil. As a result, it boosted plant growth, soil microbial population, and plant biomass and lowered the weed population [ 11 ].
Azospirillum is a Gram-negative, aerobic nitrogen-fixing bacteria that do not form nodules and belong to the Spirilaceae family [ 56 ]. Although there are several species in this genus, such as Azospirillum amazonense , Azospirillum halopraeferens , and Azospirillum brasilense , Azospirillum lipoferum and A. brasilense are the most beneficial [ 57 ]. Because they develop and fix nitrogen on the organic salts of malic and aspartic acid, Azospirillum forms associative symbiosis with many plants, notably those with the C 4 dicarboxylic pathway (Hatch–Slack pathway) of photosynthesis [ 58 ]. As a result, it is mostly suggested for maize, sugarcane, sorghum, pearl millet, and other crops. They make growth stimulants (IAA, gibberellins, and cytokinin) that help in root development and nutrient uptake (N, P, and K). Inoculation with Azospirillum has a significant impact on root development and exudation [ 59 ]. When A. brasilense sp. 245 was inoculated to maize, the production of various phytohormones increased noticeably, resulting in a significant increase in maize growth [ 16 ]. The root physiology and architecture of maize were altered as a result of the increased synthesis of several phytohormones, resulting in an increase in mineral intake by the plant [ 16 ]. Inoculation with Azospirillum and Pseudomonas altered the cultivable bacterial community in the wheat rhizosphere, according to Naiman et al. [ 60 ]. They also found that inoculating the soil microflora with Azospirillum and Pseudomonas altered the profiles of carbon source use during the tillering and grain filling stages [ 60 ]. Inoculation with two A. brasilense strains (40 and 42 M) isolated from maize roots was also found to affect the community-level physiological profiles of the cultivable microbial communities associated with rice [ 59 ].
Azotobacter is a genus of non-symbiotic, free-living, aerobic, photoautotrophic bacteria belonging to the Azotobacteriaceae family. Azotobacter chroococcum is the most frequent species in arable soils [ 61 ]. They are usually found in neutral and alkaline soils. Azotobacter vinelandii , Azotobacter beijerinckii , Azotobacter insignis , and Azotobacter macrocytogenes are among the other species identified [ 57 ]. They produce the Vitamin B complex and various phytohormones such as gibberellins, naphthalene acetic acid (NAA), and other compounds that prevent root infections while promoting root growth and mineral uptake [ 62 ]. Azotobacter has been found to release chemicals that limit the growth of certain root infections while also improving root growth and nutrient uptake [ 16 ]. Azotobacter has also been found to add 15–93 kg N/ha to Paspalum notatum roots [ 11 ]. Another strain, Azotobacter indicum , can produce a variety of antifungal antibiotics that are utilized to reduce seedling mortality by inhibiting the growth of many harmful fungi in the root region [ 63 ]. Azotobacter populations are often low in the rhizosphere of crop plants and in uncultivated soils, according to research. This organism has been found in the rhizosphere of a variety of crops, including rice, maize, sugarcane, bajra, vegetables, and plantation crops [ 64 ].
The blue-green algae are photosynthetic organisms that belongs to eight different families. They promote plant growth by generating auxin, indole acetic acid, and gibberllic acid, as well as fixing roughly 20–30 kg N/ha in submerged rice fields [ 57 ]. For lowland rice production, nitrogen is one of the main nutrients required in high quantities. Soil nitrogen and biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) by related microorganisms are the two main sources of nitrogen [ 43 , 65 ]. Fungi, liverworts, ferns, and flowering plants create symbiotic relationships with blue-green algae [ 45 ]. Anabena oryzae , Nostoc calcicola , and Spirulina sp. are three blue-green algae that have been shown to reduce the quantity of galls and egg masses induced by the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita infecting cowpea, and to improve plant growth [ 16 ].
Azolla has a 4–5% nitrogen content on a dry basis and 0.2–0.4% on a wet basis. In rice production, it can be a valuable source of organic manure and nitrogen [ 57 ]. The important aspect of using Azolla as a biofertilizer is that it decomposes quickly in the soil and provides nitrogen to rice plants efficiently. In addition, it adds to the provision of phosphorus, potassium, zinc, iron, molybdenum, and other micronutrients [ 66 ]. Prior to rice cultivation, Azolla can be utilized as a green biofertilizer in the fields. Azolla pinnata is the most commonly used species in India, and it may be produced commercially through vegetative techniques [ 14 ]. Azolla caroliniana , Azolla microphylla , Azolla filiculoides , and Azolla mexicana are some of the other Azolla species that have been introduced to India for their huge biomass output [ 57 ].
Despite the fact that phosphorus is abundant in the soil, the majority of it is insoluble and hence is inaccessible to support plant growth, since plants only absorb it in two soluble forms: monobasic and dibasic. Inorganic phosphorus, such as apatite, or organic phosphorus, such as inositol phosphate (soil phytate), phosphomonoesters, and phosphotriesters, may be present [ 67 ]. Furthermore, much of the soluble inorganic phosphorus used in chemical fertilizers is quickly immobilized after being applied to the field. As a result, it is unavailable to plants and hence is wasted [ 67 ]. This has prompted researchers to look for environmentally benign and cost-effective ways to boost crop output in low-phosphorus soils. Microbes that can solubilize inorganic phosphorus play a critical role in these settings as a potential option for providing phosphorus to the plants. As a result, they are regarded as a promising biofertilizer, since they may provide the necessary phosphorus to plants, even from low-quality sources [ 14 ].
Organic acids with a low molecular weight such as gluconic and citric acids, which are generated by several soil microorganisms, are responsible for inorganic phosphorus solubilization [ 30 ]. Figure 3 depicts a schematic diagram of phosphate solubilization by microorganisms. The hydroxyl and carboxyl groups in these low-molecular-weight organic acids can chelate the cations attached to phosphate, resulting in the conversion of insoluble phosphorous to its soluble form. The mineralization of organic phosphorus, on the other hand, is accomplished by the production of several phosphatases that catalyze the hydrolysis of phosphoric esters [ 68 ]. Above all, phosphate solubilization and mineralization can occur in the same bacterial strain [ 69 ]. Pseudomonas , Bacillus , Rhizobium , Burkholderia , Achromobacter , Agrobacterium , Micrococcus , Acetobacter , Flavobacterium , and Erwinia are among the bacteria that have the ability to solubilize insoluble inorganic phosphorus [ 11 ]. Phosphate-solubilizing bacteria are commonly found in large numbers in soils and plant rhizospheres. These comprise aerobic and anaerobic strains, with aerobic strains being more common in submerged soils [ 69 ]. However, it has been discovered that the rhizosphere has a larger concentration of phosphate-solubilizing bacteria (PSB) than non-rhizosphere soil [ 11 ]. PSB stimulate the efficacy of biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) by nitrogen-fixing bacteria, in addition to delivering phosphorus in soluble form to plants [ 70 ].
Phosphate-solubilizing rhizobacteria solubilize inorganic phosphorus. Inorganic phosphorus is solubilized by bacteria using organic acids with a low molecular weight such as gluconic and citric acids. These acids’ hydroxyl (OH) and carboxyl (COOH) groups chelate the phosphate-bound cations, converting insoluble phosphorus into a soluble organic form. Mineralization of soluble phosphorus is accomplished through the production of several phosphatases, which catalyze the hydrolysis process. When plants absorb these solubilized and mineralized phosphorus molecules, their overall growth and crop output improve dramatically [ 11 ].
Iron is an essential ingredient for practically all living things. Iron is required by all plants, animals, and microbes [ 16 ]. Iron exists as Fe 3+ in an aerobic environment and is prone to generating insoluble hydroxides and oxyhydroxides. As a result, the majority of iron is unavailable for absorption by bacteria and plants [ 16 ]. In general, bacteria obtain iron via secreting siderophores, which are low-molecular-weight iron chelators with a high affinity for complex iron ( Figure 4 ). The majority of siderophores are water-soluble, and they are classified as extracellular or intracellular siderophores [ 16 ]. Rhizobacteria differ in their ability to use siderophore cross-linking. Some Rhizobacteria use homologous siderophores proficiently, while others use heterologous siderophores [ 45 , 71 ]. Iron is reduced from Fe 3+ to Fe 2+ in the bacterial membrane in both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, and then released into the cell through siderophores via a gating mechanism that connects the inner and outside membranes ( Figure 4 ). Under iron-limiting conditions, siderophores operate as solubilizing agents for iron from minerals or organic molecules [ 72 ]. Similar to iron, siderophores create stable complexes with other heavy metals, as well as radioactive particles such as uranium and neptunium [ 73 ]. The concentration of soluble metal increases when the siderophores bind to a heavy metal. As a result, bacterial siderophores assist the host plant to reduce the stress caused by elevated heavy metal levels in the soil [ 30 ]. Plants absorb iron from bacterial siderophores using a variety of processes, including chelation and release, direct uptake of siderophore–Fe complexes, and ligand exchange reactions [ 74 ]. According to Thomine and Lanquar [ 74 ], siderophores facilitated iron transfer in oat plants and elevated plant growth. Rhizophore-produced siderophores delivered iron to the oat plant, which possesses a mechanism for utilizing Fe siderophores when iron is scarce [ 74 ]. Pseudomonas fluorescens C 7 generated the Fe–pyoverdine complex, which was taken up by Arabidopsis thaliana plants, resulting in a rise in iron levels in plant tissues and improved plant growth [ 71 ]. When plants are exposed to stress situations such as heavy metal pollution, the availability of iron to plants by soil bacteria becomes extremely important. In this case, siderophores can also assist plants to cope with the stress caused by high amounts of heavy metals [ 73 ].
Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria produce siderophores, which are used to sequester iron. Bacteria release low-molecular-weight iron chelators known as “siderophores,” which have high affinity for Fe 3+ , bind firmly to it, and are taken up by bacteria. Fe 3+ is converted to Fe 2+ inside the bacterial membrane, and Fe 2+ is discharged into the cell via a gated channel that connects the bacteria’s inner and outer membranes. The total plant growth improves significantly when the host plant integrates these soluble Fe 2+ molecules produced by the bacteria.
Plant hormones, also known as phytohormones, play a crucial role in plant growth and development [ 16 ]. When plants are exposed to growth-limiting environmental conditions, evidence suggests that they modify their endogenous phytohormone levels to reduce the detrimental impacts of environmental stress [ 16 ]. Microorganisms in the rhizosphere have been found to produce or modify phytohormone levels in the host plants. As a result, by modifying the level of endogenous phytohormones in the host plants, they can considerably influence the hormonal balance and stress response of the host plant [ 30 ]. For a long period, scientists have known that bacteria produce the phytohormone auxin (indole-3-acetic acid/indole acetic acid/IAA). According to one study, 80% of microorganisms isolated from the rhizosphere of diverse crops are capable of generating and releasing auxins as secondary metabolites [ 72 ].
Indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) is involved in many aspects of plant growth and development, as well as defense responses. The exceptional complexity of IAA biosynthesis, its transport mechanisms, and the different signaling pathways involved in IAA synthesis and transport reflects this diversity of roles [ 75 ]. In general, IAA stimulates seed and tuber germination; increases the rate of xylem and root development; controls vegetative growth processes; initiates lateral and adventitious root formation; mediates responses to light, gravity, and fluorescence; and affects photosynthesis and pigment formation, the biosynthesis of various metabolites, and stress resistance [ 28 ]. Because IAA is involved in various cell division and vascular bundle creation processes, it appears that a higher level of IAA in the host legume plants is required for nodule development [ 29 ]. Furthermore, bacterial IAA increases the root surface area and root length, allowing the plant to acquire soil nutrients more easily [ 29 ].
Furthermore, rhizobacterial IAA loosens plant cell walls, allowing for greater root exudation, which offers additional nutrients to sustain bacterial development [ 29 ]. As a result, rhizobacterial IAA has been identified as a crucial effector molecule in both disease and phytostimulation in plant–microbe interactions [ 29 ]. The amino acid tryptophan is an important component that influences IAA production levels. Tryptophan has been identified as the principal precursor of IAA and has been shown to have an important role in altering IAA biosynthesis levels [ 16 ]. Starting with tryptophan, at least five distinct processes for the synthesis of IAA have been reported, most of which are comparable with the mechanisms discovered in plants, but a few intermediates differ in each case [ 76 ]. The production of IAA via indole-3-pyruvic acid and indole-3-acetic aldehyde is the first pathway. The majority of bacteria, including Rhizobium , Azospirillum , Erwinia herbicola , Klebsiella , and others, use this pathway. The conversion of tryptophan to indole-3-acetic aldehyde is the second process, which may include an alternate pathway by which tryptamine is generated. Pseudomonas and Azospirilla use this route. The biosynthesis of IAA occurs via indole-3-acetamide in the third route. Agrobacterium tumefaciens , Pseudomonas syringae , and other phytopathogenic bacteria use this pathway. The conversion of tryptophan into indole-3-acetonitrile is the fourth step for IAA biosynthesis. Cyanobacteria have this mechanism. The last mechanism, which is more widespread in plants, Cyanobacteria, and Azospirilla , is the production of IAA via a tryptophan-independent pathway. Although bacterial IAA has been implicated in almost every aspect of plant growth and development, the acquisition of bacterial IAA may modify the endogenous pool of plant IAA. The degree of endogenous IAA in plants is critical in determining whether bacterial IAA stimulates or hinders plant growth in this respect. Endogenous IAA has been determined to be either ideal or sub-optimal for plant root development [ 30 ].
Synthesizing multiple types of antibiotics is the most common way for plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) to limit plant pathogen proliferation [ 77 , 78 ]. Many of the compounds have been thoroughly researched and some have even been marketed. The majority of commercialized rhizobacterial products function as bio-inoculants to combat plant diseases rather than to improve plant nutrition or reduce abiotic stressors [ 77 ]. Plant illnesses caused by pathogens such as Fusarium spp., Pythium spp., Rhizoctonia spp., and Sclerotium spp. have been reported to be treated by using biofertilizers such as Trichoderma harzianum , P. fluoresecens , and Bacillus subtilis , which boost plant growth and overall output. Hydrogen cyanide (HCN), phenazines, pyrrolnitrin, 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol, pyoluteorin, viscosinamide, and tensin are among the antifungal metabolites produced by various Rhizobacteria [ 38 ]. It has also been observed that the contact between some Rhizobacteria and plant roots can protect the host plant from pathogenic fungi, bacteria, and viruses. Induced systemic resistance (ISR) is the term for this phenomenon [ 79 ]. Furthermore, ISR does not necessitate any direct interaction between the pathogens and the resistance-inducing PGPB [ 30 ].
Induced systemic resistance (ISR) is caused by jasmonate and ethylene signaling in the host plant, which acts as a defense mechanism against a range of plant pathogens [ 30 ]. Many individual bacterial components, such as lipopolysaccharides (LPS), flagella, siderophores, cyclic lipopeptides, 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol, and homoserine lactones, as well as volatile compounds such as 2,3 butanediol and acetonin, have been reported to cause ISR in the host plant, allowing the host plant to combat a variety of plant pathogens [ 79 ]. Some biocontrol bacteria generate enzymes such as chitinases, cellulases, 1,3-gluconases, proteases, and lipases that can lyse a section of the cell wall of many pathogenic fungi such as Botrytis cinerea , Sclerotium rolfsii , Fusarium oxysporum , Phytophthora spp., Rhizoctonia solani , and Pythium ultimum [ 80 , 81 ]. Some PGPB strains produce siderophores, which operate as a biocontrol agent. In this approach, PGPB’s siderophores prevent pathogens from acquiring adequate iron, limiting their growth and proliferation [ 80 ]. Because the siderophores produced by PGPB have a higher affinity for iron than the pathogens, this technique is effective. As a result, the infections’ ability to utilize iron is diminished and they are unable to multiply in the rhizosphere [ 30 ]. Plants have been reported to synthesize ethylene in response to a range of stressors, including fungal phytopathogenic infections [ 82 ]. When plant cells become infected, ethylene causes a stress/senescence response in the plant, which results in the death of cells that are either infected or present near the fungal infection site [ 82 ]. As a result, increasing levels of ethylene build up, as well as the infection caused by plant pathogens, causing a large amount of the harm to the plant. Exogenous ethylene has also been shown to exacerbate the severity of fungal infections. As a result, lowering the ethylene response is one strategy to reduce the harm produced by phytopathogen infections of the host plants [ 3 ]. Ethylene inhibitors have been found to not only reduce the ethylene response level but also to diminish the severity of fungal infections. When the host plant is affected by pathogens, the enzyme ACC deaminase found in PGPB can adjust the ethylene level [ 16 ]. As a result, the most straightforward strategy to reduce ethylene levels is to apply PGPB harboring the ACC deaminase gene to the plants (usually the roots or seeds).
To meet the increased need for food, continuous and indiscriminate usage of synthetic or chemical fertilizers has unquestionably resulted in contamination and ecosystem modification [ 16 ]. Even so, the long-term impacts of using synthetic or chemical fertilizers lower soil fertility and have resulted in the production of disease-prone crops [ 83 , 84 ]. The amount of food produced today compared with the amount required to feed everyone in 2050 is drastically lower. By 2050, the world’s population will have swelled to about 10 billion people, with roughly 4.5 billion more mouths to feed than in 2022. People will consume more resource-intensive, animal-based diets as their wages rise. To feed the growing population with a deficit amount of available nutrients, the world certainly needs to encourage agricultural productivity in a sustainable and ecofriendly way. Hence, it is necessary to re-evaluate many of the existing agricultural approaches, which include the use of chemical fertilizers, pesticides, herbicides, fungicides, and insecticides [ 85 ]. In light of the harmful effects of chemical or synthetic fertilizers, biofertilizers are supposed may be a safe alternative to chemical inputs and minimize alteration of the ecosystem to a great extent. Biofertilizers are cost-effective and ecofriendly in nature, and their prolonged use enhances soil fertility substantially [ 16 ]. It has been found that using biofertilizers increases crop yield by 10–40% by increasing protein, vital amino acids, and vitamins, and nitrogen fixation [ 86 ]. Biofertilizers provide a number of advantages, including being a low-cost source of nutrients, excellent suppliers of micro-compounds and micronutrients, organic matter suppliers, growth hormone producers, and a means of counteracting the negative effects of chemical fertilizers [ 87 ]. Different microorganisms are important components of soil, and they play a key role in a variety of biotic activities in the soil ecosystem that keep the soil active for nutrient mobilization and long-term crop development [ 45 ].
The continuous rise in the global population has translated to a direct increase in the demand for food production. The use of these biofertilizers has been reported to boost the food production rate, and they are a safer farm product for consumers; hence, biofertilizers remains a better alternative for producing safer crops and enhancing global food security. In recent years, the plant nutrient gap between removal and supply through chemical fertilizer was over 10 million tons. Over-dependence on chemical fertilizers, in terms of both cost and environmental impact, is not a viable strategy in the long run due to the costs involved in setting up fertilizer plants and maintaining production, both in terms of domestic resources and foreign exchange. Biofertilizers are products that, once adequate information is available to producers and farmers, are likely to be commercially promising in the long run. The use of biofertilizers in the world will not only have an impact on the economic development of sustainable agriculture, but it will also contribute to a sustainable ecosystem and the overall wellbeing of humans.
This research received no external funding. The APC was funded by the Department of Science and Innovation and the Technology Innovation Agency distributed by GrainSA (Grant numbers: GB0200065 and GB0200066). The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.
Conceptualization, A.I.D. and A.K.; methodology, A.I.D., A.O.F., A.G., O.O.B., O.A., S.F. and A.F.B.; software, A.I.D. and A.O.F.; validation, A.I.D. and A.O.F.; formal analysis, A.I.D. and A.O.F.; resources, A.K., A.I.D., A.O.F. and M.K.; writing—original draft preparation, A.I.D. and A.O.F.; writing—review and editing, A.I.D., A.O.F., O.O.B., A.G., V.M., M.K. and A.K.; supervision, M.K. and A.K.; project administration, A.K. and M.K.; funding acquisition, A.K. and M.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Informed consent statement, data availability statement, conflicts of interest.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Fertilizer made from city sewage has been spread on millions of acres of farmland for decades. Scientists say it can contain high levels of the toxic substance.
Jordan Vonderhaar for The New York Times
Hiroko Tabuchi traveled to Texas and Michigan and interviewed ranchers, scientists, investigators and wastewater-treatment experts for this article.
Aug. 31, 2024
Supported by
For decades, farmers across America have been encouraged by the federal government to spread municipal sewage on millions of acres of farmland as fertilizer. It was rich in nutrients, and it helped keep the sludge out of landfills.
But a growing body of research shows that this black sludge, made from the sewage that flows from homes and factories, can contain heavy concentrations of chemicals thought to increase the risk of certain types of cancer and to cause birth defects and developmental delays in children.
Known as “forever chemicals” because of their longevity, these toxic contaminants are now being detected, sometimes at high levels, on farmland across the country , including in Texas, Maine, Michigan, New York and Tennessee. In some cases the chemicals are suspected of sickening or killing livestock and are turning up in produce. Farmers are beginning to fear for their own health.
The national scale of farmland contamination by these chemicals — which are used in everything from microwave popcorn bags and firefighting gear to nonstick pans and stain-resistant carpets — is only now starting to become apparent. There are now lawsuits against providers of the fertilizer, as well as against the Environmental Protection Agency, alleging that the agency failed to regulate the chemicals, known as PFAS.
In Michigan, among the first states to investigate the chemicals in sludge fertilizer, officials shut down one farm where tests found particularly high concentrations in the soil and in cattle that grazed on the land. This year, the state prohibited the property from ever again being used for agriculture. Michigan hasn’t conducted widespread testing at other farms, partly out of concern for the economic effects on its agriculture industry.
We are having trouble retrieving the article content.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.
Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.
Thank you for your patience while we verify access.
Already a subscriber? Log in .
Want all of The Times? Subscribe .
Advertisement
Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.
For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here .
Loading metrics
Open Access
Peer-reviewed
Research Article
Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing – original draft
Affiliations Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Agroecological Processing and Safety Monitoring, College of Life Sciences, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China, Key Laboratory of Crop Ecology and Molecular Physiology, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China
Roles Data curation
Affiliations Key Laboratory of Crop Ecology and Molecular Physiology, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China, Key Laboratory for Genetics, Breeding and Multiple Utilization of Crops, Ministry of Education / College of Crop Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China
Roles Formal analysis
Affiliation Fujian Vocational College of Agriculture, Fuzhou, China
Roles Writing – original draft
Roles Formal analysis, Project administration
* E-mail: [email protected] (WL); [email protected] (ZL)
Roles Project administration, Supervision, Writing – review & editing
Affiliations Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Agroecological Processing and Safety Monitoring, College of Life Sciences, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China, Key Laboratory of Crop Ecology and Molecular Physiology, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China, Key Laboratory for Genetics, Breeding and Multiple Utilization of Crops, Ministry of Education / College of Crop Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China
Sustainable agriculture is an important global issue. The use of organic fertilizers can enhance crop yield and soil properties while restraining pests and diseases. The objective of this study was to assess the effects of long-term use of chemical and organic fertilizers on tea and rhizosphere soil properties in tea orchards. Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) and high-throughput sequencing technology analyses were used to investigate heavy metals content and bacterial composition in rhizosphere soils. Our results indicated that organic fertilizer treatment significantly decreased Cu, Pb and Cd contents in rhizosphere soil sample. The results also showed that treatment with organic fertilizer significantly decreased the contents of Cd, Pb and As in tea leaves. Furthermore, organic fertilizer significantly increased the amino acids content of tea and the pH of the soil. The use of organic fertilizer significantly increased in the relative abundance of Burkholderiales , Myxococcales , Streptomycetales , Nitrospirales , Ktedonobacterales , Acidobacteriales , Gemmatimonadales , and Solibacterales , and decreased the abundance of Pseudonocardiales , Frankiales , Rhizobiales , and Xanthomonadales . In conclusion, organic fertilizer can help to shape the microbial composition and recruit beneficial bacteria into the rhizosphere of tea, leading to improved tea quality and reduced heavy metals content in rhizosphere soil and tea leaves.
Citation: Lin W, Lin M, Zhou H, Wu H, Li Z, Lin W (2019) The effects of chemical and organic fertilizer usage on rhizosphere soil in tea orchards. PLoS ONE 14(5): e0217018. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217018
Editor: Fuzhong Wu, Sichuan Agricultural University, CHINA
Received: December 13, 2018; Accepted: May 2, 2019; Published: May 28, 2019
Copyright: © 2019 Lin et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: This work was supported by: National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31701329, 81573530); Fujian-Taiwan Joint Innovative Center for Germplasm Resources and Cultivation of Crop (Fujian 2011 Program, No.2015-75, China); the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province (No. 2016J01100); and the Project Funded by China Postdoral Science Foundation (No. 2015M580560).
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Camellia sinensis, commonly known as tea plant, is a mountainous crop and an important agricultural product for many farmers in China. Due to its richness in beneficial antioxidants, vitamins, and amino acids, the popularity of tea has been steadily growing. And the amino acids, tea polyphenols, and caffeine are key elements in determining both taste and quality of tea. In 2016, China produced 2.41 million tons of tea with a monetary value of 170.2 billion yuan. However, soil degradation and substantial quality and yield decrease have been observed in the long-term monoculture of tea bushes, and have become key problems in the sustainable development of tea orchards [ 1 ]. With growing demand and limited land availability, farmers have been increasingly using nitrogen fertilizers in order to increase crop yield. However, nitrogen fertilizers can have undesirable effects, including a decline in tea quality, soil acidification, heavy metals pollution, soil compaction, and changes in soil microbiome [ 2 – 3 ]. We have previously shown that long-term tea cultivation with nitrogen fertilizers altered the bacterial composition of soil and significantly decreased soil pH and microbial metabolic activity, resulting in a reduction of beneficial bacteria [ 1 , 4 – 5 ]. Therefore, it is essential to understand the impact of nitrogen fertilizers beyond their effects on crop yield in order to achieve a balance between benefits and harms in modern agricultural practices.
The sustainability of agricultural systems is an important global issue. This has resulted in the potential benefits of organic fertilizers application have being highlighted. Organic fertilizers are derived from natural sources (e.g., livestock and poultry excreta, plant residues, biogas residue, and agricultural by-products), and their usage can have a positive impact on pollution. The potential benefits of organic fertilizers have been documented in a number of studies in which investigators observed a raise in soil microbial activities, which in turn improved crop growth and restrained pests and diseases [ 6 – 7 ]. Soil contains a large number of microbial species as well as other organisms that together form a highly complex ecosystem. Microorganisms are essential for nutrient recycling, healthy plant development, and decomposition of organic matter [ 8 ]. However, environmental conditions and cultivation practices are likely to influence the microbiome, resulting in alterations in soil characteristics or ecosystem [ 9 ]. Researchers have found that tea cultivated with bio-organic fertilizers has superior color and taste compared to tea treated with chemical fertilizers [ 10 – 11 ]. Studies have also suggested that the use of organic fertilizers resulted in higher seedling biomass and significantly improved the soil fungal to bacterial ratio as well as soil enzyme activity [ 12 – 13 ]. In addition, while long-term application of chemical fertilizers could lead to serious soil acidification, nutritional imbalance, and deterioration of the rhizosphere micro-ecological environment, further increased the activity of heavy metal ions in soil. The use of organic fertilizer could alleviate soil acidification, resulting in increased plant yields [ 14 ]. However, little information is available concerning the contents changes of microbial community and heavy metal ions using long-term chemical fertilizers and organic fertilizer.
Recent studies have raised concerns regarding the long-term effects of fertilization practices on biological properties of soils, but most studies focused mainly on tea plant yield and changes in soil nutrients [ 15 – 17 ]. Moreover, the effects of long-term use of organic fertilizer on rhizosphere bacterial composition and heavy metals in tea gardens have not been carefully investigated. In this study, we have used ICP-MS and high-throughput sequencing technology to determine the effects of organic and chemical fertilizers on bacterial taxa and heavy metals content in the rhizosphere of tea orchards. Herein we evaluated potential mechanisms of organic fertilizers application as a means to improve the quality of tea. These results could provide practical guidance to the design of sustainable tea garden ecology.
Field experiment and soil sampling.
The experimental station is located in the Zudun township of Nanping in the Fujian Province of China (27°24ʹN, 118°33ʹE). This is one of the main tea producing region in Fujian and is under sub-tropical monsoon climate with an average annual temperature of 18.1°C and an average annual rainfall of 1557–1743 mm. Zudun township of Fujian Province is the most important producing area of white tea in China. The two different planting and management patterns were the long-term organic fertilizer (mainly contain rape cake and sheep dung) ecological tea garden and the conventional nitrogen fertilizer management tea garden. These tea orchards had similar environmental characteristics such as altitute, slope position and slope aspect, and similar agronomic management. The tea orchards were typical red acidity soils in southern China. These experimental fields were established in 1990 and have since been used for tea planting. The tea orchards have cultivated the Fuding white tea and the tea stand ages were more than 30 years old, were selected in this study, and each had three landscape-level replications. The organic tea orchards have been certified under the US National Organic program 7 CFR Part 205 by the certification of environmental standards Gmbh (CERES) in 2015.
Soil samples were collected from the rhizosphere of fields treated with organic fertilizer (OrgS) or chemical fertilizer (NorS) fon June 4, 2018. At the same time, non-rhizosphere soils were also collected from the organic (CKOrgS) and chemical (CKNorS) fertilizer treated tea orchards. The rhizosphere and non-rhizosphere soils of tea trees were taken from each experimental plot by a 5-point sampling method. For each sample, three replicates were performed. Tea leaves from the OrgS and NorS treatment groups were sampled in the fields. After sieving (2 mm mesh) to remove stones and plant residues, soil samples were stored at −80°C.
Tea leaves were roasted, dried and ground into a fine powder testing. The amino acid content was measured using the ninhydrin colorimetric methods. Tea polyphenols and caffeine contents were determined using a Waters HPLC system (C18 column: Inertsil ODS-SP, 4.6 × 250 mm, 5 μm). The chromatographic conditions were as follows for tea polyphenols: mobile phase A: mixture solution (water: acetic acid: acetonitrile = 90:0.1:10, v/v/v); mobile phase B: acetonitrile; elution gradient: mobile phase B 0% (0 min)→0% (10 min)→10% (20 min)→0% (25 min)→0% (30 min); oven temperature: 40°C; detection wavelength: 280 nm; velocity: 1 mL/min. For caffeine: mobile phase A: water; mobile phase B: methanol; elution gradient: mobile phase B 65% (0 min)→65% (35 min); detection wavelength: 275 nm; velocity: 1 mL/min.
Soil chemical properties analysis included pH, total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP), total potassium (TK), available nitrogen (AN), available phosphorus (AP), and available potassium (AK). Soil pH was determined using a glass electrode pH meter (1:2.5 soil to water suspensions). TN, TP, and TK were determined using Kjeldahl digestion, sodium carbonate fusion, and NaOH melts flamer methods, respectively [ 18 ]. AN was determined using the alkaline hydrolyzable method. AP was extracted with hydrochloric acid and ammonium fluoride, and contents were measured using the molybdenum blue method. AK was extracted with ammonium acetate, and measured by flame photometry [ 19 ].
The microwave digestion system (Milestone ETHOS UP, Italy) was used to extract cuprum (Cu), plumbum (Pb), cadmium (Cd) and arsenic (As) from soil samples. The contents of these metals were determined by Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS, PerkinElmer NexION 300X, U.S.A), using parameters listed in Table 1 .
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217018.t001
Total soil DNA was extracted using the BioFast soil Genomic DNA Extraction kit (BioFlux, Hangzhou, China), following the manufacturer’s instructions. For each soil sample, three independent DNA extractions were performed. DNA was diluted to a concentration of 1 ng/μL in sterile water. The variable regions 3 to 4 (V3–V4) were amplified with the specific primers 338F/806R (338F, 5’-ACTCCTACGGGAGGCAGCA-3’ ; 806R, 5’-GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTA AT-3’ ). The PCR reactions were conducted in a 50 μL mixture system, using TransStart Fastpfu DNA Polymerase (TransGen Biotechnology, Beijing, U.S.A). The PCR condition was initiated denaturation with 5 min at 95°C, followed by 35 cycles of 40 s at 95°C, 40 s at 58°C, 60 s at 72°C and final elongation with 5 min at 72°C. PCR products were purified using the Qiagen Gel Extraction Kit (Qiagen, Germany), and subjected to sequencing on the Illumina HiSeq 2500 platform (Allwegene Technologies Co., Ltd., Beijing, China).
The FLASH method [ 20 ] was used to merge paired-end reads. Following quality filtering and chimera removal [ 21 ], the effective tags were used to perform OTU clustering and species annotation. Species annotation was performed using the Silva database ( http://www.arb-silva.de ) [ 22 ]. For each remaining sequences, the RDP classifier (Version 2.2) algorithm [ 23 ] was used to annotate taxonomic information via the GreenGen database [ 24 ]. Mothur version 1.31.2 [ 25 ] was used to analyze the alpha diversities. Beta diversities were then calculated to analyze the complexity of species diversity. The Statistical Package for the GraphPad Prism version 5.1 and the Data Processing System (DPS) version 7.05 were used for statistical analysis. Differences among the treatments were calculated and statistically analyzed using the analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the LSD multiple range tests (p < 0.05).
In this study, we found that the use of organic fertilizer significantly increased the amino acids content of tea ( Fig 1 ). The contents of polyphenol did not reach statistical significance in tea samples from fields treated with organic fertilizer compared to those treated with chemical fertilizer. In contrast, tea under long-term treatment with chemical fertilizer showed significantly higher contents of caffeine compared to tea with organic fertilizer.
Columns with different letters are statistically different (LSD test, P < 0.05).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217018.g001
Table 2 summarized the chemical properties of soil from tea orchards treated with either organic or chemical fertilizers. Contents of total nitrogen, total potassium, available nitrogen, available phosphorus, and available potassium were similar between the two treatment groups (P > 0.05). However, soil pH level was significantly higher in the organic fertilizer treatment group compared to the chemical fertilizer treatment group ( Table 2 ).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217018.t002
Tea orchards with long-term organic or chemical fertilizer treatment showed significant differences in soil chemical properties ( Fig 2 ). Treatment with organic fertilizer resulted in significantly lower contents (P < 0.05) of cuprum (Cu), plumbum (Pb) and cadmium (Cd) in rhizosphere soils compared to the chemical fertilizer treatment group. A small decrease in arsenic (As) level was also detected in the organic fertilizer treatment group, but the difference was not statistically significant. Similar trends were observed in non-rhizosphere soil samples. Our results also showed that treatment with organic fertilizer significantly decreased contents of Cd, Pb and As in tea leaves ( Fig 3 ).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217018.g002
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217018.g003
A total of 544,096 effective clean tags with bacterial species annotation were obtained from 12 soil samples. Alpha diversity was calculated to determine the complexity of species diversity. We observed a significantly higher bacterial composition and Chao1 indices with samples from the organic fertilizer treatment group compared to samples from the chemical fertilizer treatment group. Long-term organic fertilizer treatment also had a positive effect on non-rhizosphere soil. Our results showed that chemical fertilizer significantly increased Shannon’s diversity indices in rhizosphere soil in comparison to all treatments ( Fig 4 ).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217018.g004
We used weighted unifrac heatmap, hierarchical clustering, and principal component analysis to identify differences in bacterial composition structure between the treatment groups ( Fig 5 ). In comparison to CKNorS, higher distances were observed among the OrgS, CKOrgS, and NorS samples. The PC1 and PC2 components of PCoA accounted for 45.93% and 26.65% of the total bacterial composition variations, respectively. We found that the bacterial composition of OrgS and CKOrgS soil samples belonged to the same group based on the principal component analysis. In contrast, the bacterial composition of NorS and CKNorS samples fell into two separate groups that were distinct from OrgS and CKOrgS samples.
(A) Weighted unifrac heatmap; (B) Hierarchical clustering analysis; (C) Principal Component Analysis.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217018.g005
In this study, the classified sequences were affiliated with 24 bacterial phyla among the treatment groups. The majority of the phyla were assigned to Actinobacteria , Chloroflexi , Proteobacteria , Acidobacteria , Gemmatimonadetes , and Cyanobacteria ( S1 Fig ). Meanwhile, clear trends in variation at the phylum level were observed between the organic fertilizer and chemical fertilizer treatment groups. The number of OTUs exclusively found in OrgS and NorS samples were 78 (4.59%) and 88 (5.18%), respectively. The shared number of exclusive OTUs between OrgS and NorS were 1022 (60.19%). The shared number between OrgS and CKOrgS were 1109 (65.31%), and they dropped to 696 (41.10%) between NorS and CKNorS ( Fig 6 ).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217018.g006
The relative abundance of these bacterial orders varied among the different soil samples. A comparison between OrgS and NorS showed that organic fertilizer treatment resulted in a significant increase in the relative abundance of Burkholderiales , Myxococcales , Streptomycetales , Nitrospirales , Ktedonobacterales , Acidobacteriales , Gemmatimonadales , and Solibacterales , and a decrease in Pseudonocardiales , Frankiales , Rhizobiales , and Xanthomonadales ( S1 Table and Fig 7 ). Heat map analysis of the top 20 most abundant genera within the hierarchical cluster showed clear variations in bacterial composition structure across the four groups of soil samples, and these differences were statistically significant. Treatment with chemical fertilizer resulted in increased abundance of Acidothermus , Acidicaldus , and Acidobacterium , and decreased abundance of the potentially beneficial Nitrospira and Burkholderia in comparison with the organic fertilizer treatment group. No significant differences were detected in comparisons between OrgS and CKOrgS groups, as well as between NorS and CKNorS groups ( Fig 8 ).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217018.g007
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217018.g008
Redundancy analysis (RDA) was performed to study the relationship between soil chemical properties and abundance of dominant genera. The first two RDA components (RDA1 and RDA2) separated the organic fertilizer treated soils from the chemical fertilizer treated soils ( Fig 9 ). The chemical fertilizer treated samples (NorS) were positively related to the cadmium (Cd), Cuprum (Cu) and plumbum (Pb).
TP: total phosphorus, TN: total nitrogen, TK: total potassium, AN: available nitrogen, AK: available potassium, AP: available phosphorus.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217018.g009
The organic fertilizer treated samples (OrgS and CKOrgS) were positively related to a higher relative abundance of Catenulispora , Candidatus_Solibacter , Burkholderia-Paraburkholderia , Gemmatirosa , Nitrospira , Rhizomicrobium and negatively related to Acidobacterium , Acidothermus and Acidicaldus . Strong associations were found among total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP), available phosphorus (AP), available nitrogen (AN), cadmium (Cd), Cuprum (Cu) and plumbum (Pb) with the abundance of Acidothermus , Acidobacterium and Acidicaldus . The abundance of Acidibacter , Catenulispora , Burkholderia-Paraburkholderia , Gemmatirosa , Nitrospira , Candidatus _ Solibacter , Rhizomicrobium and Sorangium were found to be highly associated with soil pH.
For centuries, the use of organic fertilizer is a common practice to maintain soil fertility and crop yield in China [ 26 – 27 ]. With increased availability of chemical fertilizers since the late 1970s and rise of labor costs since the 1980s, the utilization of organic fertilizer has dramatically declined [ 26 , 28 ]. In order to prevent food shortage worldwide and maximize crop yield, large amounts of chemical fertilizers have been applied to arable fields over the past few decades [ 29 – 30 ]. However, excessive use of chemical fertilizers has led to several issues such as serious soil degradation, nitrogen leaching, soil compaction, reduction in soil organic matter, and loss of soil carbon. In addition, the efficacy of chemical fertilizers on crop yield has been decreasing over time [ 29 , 31 – 32 ]. Because of these concerns, there is a growing demand for development of organic agriculture. In this study, we found that N, P and K contents were not significantly different between organic and chemical fertilizer treatments. These results indicated that organic fertilizers provide similar nutrient elements as chemical fertilizer. In recent years, soil acidification has become a serious problem for modern agriculture in China [ 33 ]. The major cause of rising soil acidity is increased use of acidifying nitrogen fertilizers or incomplete cycling of nitrogen species in the soil [ 33 – 34 ]. Our previous studies have found tea orchards soil pH, tea amino acids, and phenolic compounds significantly decreased with increasing years of monoculturing [ 1 , 5 ]. Furthermore, our data showed that organic fertilizer treatment improved soil pH, and increased the contents of tea polyphenols and amino acids. It is well known that acidification can increase the mobility of heavy metals into the soil where they could be taken up by plants [ 35 – 36 ]. The RDA analysis showed the some acidic microbes were highly associated with heavy metals. Previous studies have verified the heavy metal polluted soil would affect the microbial community structure, microbial biomass and microbial residues [ 37 – 39 ]. Some specific microorganism have the ability to adsorb heavy metal [ 40 – 41 ]. We found that the contents of heavy metals (Cu, Pb, Cd, As) were lower in soil and plant samples under organic fertilizer treatment compared to those treated with chemical fertilizer. The future research should focus the potential mechanism of intrinsic linkages between microbial community and heavy metal under the organic fertilizer treatments.
Healthy and asymptomatic plants in nature are colonized by a rich diversity of microbes, with the complex plant-associated microbial community referred to as a second genome of the plant because of its effect on plant growth and productivity [ 42 – 43 ]. In this study, we found that the long-term use of organic fertilizer significantly increased the bacterial diversity in terms of species richness. Our data are in agreement with the findings of Sun et al. [ 29 ], who reported that the NPK chemical fertilizers caused a significant decrease in bacterial diversity. Significant differences in soil bacterial composition were also observed in tea orchards under long-term treatment with chemical or organic fertilizers. The most abundantly identified bacteria phyla were assigned to the Actinobacteria , Chloroflexi , Proteobacteria , and Acidobacteria phyla. Similar results were observed with long-term continuous cropping tea orchard systems [ 5 , 44 ]. Further analysis showed that Acidothermus , Acidobacterium and Acidicaldus , increased significantly in soil samples treated with chemical fertilizer, which are acidophilic and capable of proliferating in an acidic environment. In our RDA analysis, Acidibacter were found to be highly associated with soil pH. It has been well documented that soil pH has a marked influence on the composition of the microbial community [ 45 ]. Our previous study have shown the plant–microbe interactions contribute to the increased acidity and create a new environment to mediate changes in the microbial community structure in the R . pseudostellariae rhizosphere under continuous monoculture regimes [ 46 ]. We speculate that long-term application of chemical fertilizers decreased soil pH, promoted the proliferation of some specific microbes and activated the heavy metal ions in soil, further deteriorated the physicochemical properties and quality of tea. However, the long-term application of organic fertilizer was able to alleviate some of this negative effect.
Positive plant-soil feedback depends on beneficial interactions between plant roots and microorganisms for growth promotion, nutrient acquisition and disease suppression [ 4 ]. Previous studies reported that increasing years of consecutive monoculturing resulted in a significant increase in abundance of pathogens and a decrease in beneficial microorganisms in the rhizosphere of plants [ 47 – 48 ]. The significant decrease in beneficial plant bacteria was also observed in the rhizosphere soil of continuously monocultured tea [ 5 ]. In this study, the relative abundance of Burkholderia , Nitrospira , and Streptomycetales was significantly higher with organic fertilizer treatment. Previous studies have found that Burkholderia was able to inhibit the growth of pathogens and in effect acted as a Bio-organic fertilizer to improve plant growth [ 49 – 50 ]. Nitrospira is a ubiquitous bacterium that has a role in the nitrogen cycle by performing nitrite oxidation in the second step of nitrification [ 51 – 52 ]. Furthermore, Streptomycetales can act as PGPR (rhizosphere growth-promoting bacteria) to reduce plant disease and are associated with plant disease suppression in many soils [ 53 – 54 ]. These results suggested that organic fertilizer could improve the soil environment to create a new condition for the growth of potentially beneficial microbes.
In conclusion, long-term application of organic fertilizer treatment will improve the rhizosphere environment in tea orchards. And the organic fertilizer improved tea quality and decreased the level of heavy metals in rhizosphere soil. Furthermore, soil pH and shift in microbiomes were related to fertilizers treatments. Our findings suggest that organic fertilizer can shape microbial composition and recruit beneficial bacteria into the rhizosphere of tea. These results provide a promising strategy to tea orchards by treatment with organic fertilizers.
S1 table. relative abundance of the bacterial order among the different samples..
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217018.s001
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217018.s002
This work was supported by by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31701329, 81573530), Fujian-Taiwan Joint Innovative Center for Germplasm Resources and Cultivation of Crop (Fujian 2011 Program, No.2015-75, China), the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province (No. 2016J01100), and the Project Funded by China Postdoral Science Foundation (No. 2015M580560).
Rhizosphere engineering approach is considered a quantum leap in plant sciences. The current study focused on investigating rhizobacterial efficiency to mobilize bioavailable phosphate from insoluble-phosphate source. Four efficient phosphate-solubilizing bacterial isolates, i.e., Pseudomonas songnenensis (GR3), Stutzerimonas stutzeri (HH2), Bacillus bingmayongensis (KH3), and Achromobacter aegrifaciens (MH1) were selected for the current study. Interactions between various physiological parameters and phosphate solubilization efficiency of isolates revealed that glucose significantly facilitated phosphorus solubilization at 37 ℃, with media having pH 7 and 0.5% phosphorous. Additionally, positive correlation among P-solubilization potential, acids produced, and pH was observed. Plant microbe-interaction analysis was performed to evaluate the efficiency of these bacterial isolates on various morpho-physiological responses of Zea mays L. For this purpose, various concentrations of tricalcium phosphate (TCP) (0, 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 mM) were applied to plants in the presence and absence of bacterial isolates. The results showed that lower phosphate levels (10 and 20 mM) trigger shoot development and improve plant weight and leaf formation whereas higher phosphate concentrations (30 mM and above) stimulated the development of longer root system. The bacterial isolates, KH3 and HH2, were observed as efficient phosphate-solubilizing bacteria (PSB) that positively stimulated various plant growth and biochemical attributes over untreated plants. At lower phosphate levels, substantial increase of 92, 65, and 200% in shoot length, fresh weight, and number of leaves was recorded with bacterial isolate HH2, whereas, at 30 mM TCP, increase of 165% was observed in root length of plants treated with bacterial isolate KH3 compared to control. Similarly, at lower phosphate levels, increment of 57.3, 76.7, and 217% in phosphate, protein, and auxin content was recorded in plants treated with bacterial isolate HH2, and increase of 188.8% in total soluble carbohydrates was observed in plants treated with bacterial isolate KH3 as compared to control. Contrarily, increment in total chlorophyll content was most substantial (207%) by the bacterial isolate KH3 when provided with 30 mM TCP. Hence, the current study reviled that the use of these phosphates (KH3 and HH2)-solubilizing PGPR, as an efficient phytostimulator used for crop production in the replacement of chemical fertilizers, is carcinogenic and deteriorating our eco-system.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Subscribe and save.
Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Rent this article via DeepDyve
Institutional subscriptions
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Not applicable.
Adebayo AA, Faleye TOC, Adeosun OM, Alhaji IA, Egbe NE (2023) Plant growth promoting potentials of novel phosphate-solubilizing bacteria isolated from rumen content of White Fulani cattle, indigenous to Nigeria. Biol Plant 78(6):201–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11756-022-01227-z
Article CAS Google Scholar
Adnan M, Zahir S, Fahad S, Arif M, Mukhtar A, Imtiaz AK, Ishaq AM, Abdul B, Hidayat U, Muhammad A, Inayat-Ur R, Saud S, Muhammad ZI, Yousaf J, Amanullah HMH, Wajid N (2018) Phosphate-solubilizing bacteria nullify the antagonistic effect of soil calcification on bioavailability of phosphorus in alkaline soils. Sci Rep 8:4339. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-22653-7
Adnan M, Fahad S, Khan IA, Saeed M, Ihsan MZ, Saud S, Riaz M, Wang D, Wu C (2019) Integration of poultry manure and phosphate solubilizing bacteria improved availability of Ca bound P in calcareous soils. 3 Biotech 9(10):368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-019-1894-2
Article Google Scholar
Adnan M, Fahad S, Muhammad Z, Shahen S, Ishaq AM, Subhan D, Zafar-ul-Hye M, Martin LB, Raja MMN, Beena S, Saud S, Imran A, Zhen Y, Martin B, Jiri H, Rahul D (2020) Coupling phosphate-solubilizing bacteria with phosphorus supplements improve maize phosphorus acquisition and growth under lime induced salinity stress. Plants 9(7):900. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9070900
Adnan M, Fahad S, Saleem MH, Ali B, Mussart M, Ullah R, Marc RA (2022) Comparative efficacy of phosphorous supplements with phosphate solubilizing bacteria for optimizing wheat yield in calcareous soils. Sci Rep 12(1):11997. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-16035-3
Ahmed A, Hasnain S (2020) Extraction and evaluation of indole acetic acid from indigenous auxin-producing rhizosphere bacteria. JAPS: J Anim Plant Sci 30(4):1024–1036. https://doi.org/10.36899/JAPS.2020.4.0117
Ait-Ouakrim EH, Chakhchar A, El Modafar C, Douira A, Amir S, Bnsouda-Koraichi S, Filali-Maltouf A (2023) Valorization of Moroccan phosphate sludge through isolation and characterization of phosphate solubilizing bacteria and assessment of their growth promotion effect on Phaseolus vulgaris. Waste Weight Valor 14(8):2673–2690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-023-02054-2
Bargaz A, Elhaissoufi W, Khourchi S, Benmrid B, Borden KA, Rchiad Z (2021) Benefits of phosphate solubilizing bacteria on belowground crop performance for improved crop acquisition of phosphorus. Microbiol Res 252:126842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2021.126842
Blanco-Vargas A, Rodríguez-Gacha LM, Sánchez-Castro N, Garzón-Jaramillo R, Pedroza-Camacho LD, Poutou-Piñales RA, Pedroza-Rodríguez AM (2020) Phosphate-solubilizing Pseudomonas sp., and Serratia sp., co-culture for Allium cepa L. growth promotion. Heliyon 6(10):e05218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05218
Borden KA, Mafa-Attoye TG, Dunfield KE, Thevathasan NV, Gordon AM, Isaac ME (2021) Root functional trait and soil microbial coordination: implications for soil respiration in Riparian agroecosystems. Front Plant Sci 12:1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPLS.2021.681113
Bradstreet RB (1954) Kjeldahl method for organic nitrogen. Anal Chem 26(1):185–187. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60085a028
DuBois M, Gilles K, Hamilton J, Rebers P, Smith F (1956) Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal Chem 28(3):350–356. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60111a017
Etesami H (2020) Enhanced phosphorus fertilizer use efficiency with microorganisms. In: Meena R (ed) Nutrient dynamics for sustainable crop production. Springer, Singapore, pp 215–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8660-2_8
Chapter Google Scholar
Flatian AN, Anas I, Sutandi A (2021) The ability of some microbes to solubilize the hardly soluble phosphorous and potassium from various sources in vitro. In : IOP Conference Series: Earth Environ Sci IOP Publishing 648(1):012143. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/648/1/012143
Habib S, Ahmed A (2022) Expression profiling of stress protectants in Zea mays L. plants treated with Bacillus pumilus : surfactant-producing bioeffector. Int J Environ Sci Technol 20:4435–4446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-022-04089-9
Hii YS, San CY, Lau SW, Danquah MK (2020) Isolation and characterisation of phosphate solubilizing microorganisms from peat. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol 26:101643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2020.101643
Iqbal M, Naveed M, Sanaullah M, Brtnicky M, Hussain MI, Kucerik J, Holatko J, Mustafa A (2023) Plant microbe mediated enhancement in growth and yield of canola ( Brassica napus L.) plant through auxin production and increased nutrient acquisition. J Soils Sediments 23(3):1233–1249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-022-03386-7
Jain R, Bhardwaj P, Guleria S, Pandey A, Kumar S (2023) Polyamine metabolizing rhizobacteria Pseudomonas sp. GBPI_506 modulates hormone signaling to enhance lateral roots and nicotine biosynthesis in Nicotiana benthamiana . Plant Physiol Biochem 195:193–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2023.01.010
Kaur C, Selvakumar G, Upreti KK (2021) Organic acid profiles of phosphate solubilizing bacterial isolates in the presence of different insoluble phosphatic sources under. J Pure Appl Microbiol 15(2):1006–1016. https://doi.org/10.22207/JPAM.15.2.59
Khan H, Akbar WA, Shah Z, Rahim HU, Taj A, Alatalo JM (2022) Coupling phosphate-solubilizing bacteria (PSB) with inorganic phosphorus fertilizer improves mungbean ( Vigna radiata ) phosphorus acquisition, nitrogen fixation, and yield in alkaline-calcareous soil. Heliyon 8(3):e09081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09081
Kirui CK, Njeru EM, Runo S (2022) Diversity and phosphate solubilization efficiency of phosphate solubilizing bacteria isolated from semi-arid agroecosystems of Eastern Kenya. Microbiol Insights 15:11786361221088992. https://doi.org/10.1177/11786361221088991
Lichtenthaler HK, Wellburn AR (1983) Determinations of total carotenoids and chlorophylls a and b of leaf extracts in diferent solvents. Biochem Soc Trans 11(5):591–592. https://doi.org/10.1042/bst0110591
Liu D (2021) Root developmental responses to phosphorus nutrition. J Integr Plant Biol 63(6):1065–1090. https://doi.org/10.1111/jipb.13090
Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ (1951) Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 193:265–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9258(19)52451-6
Lu J, Liu S, Chen W, Meng J (2023) Study on the mechanism of biochar affecting the effectiveness of phosphate solubilizing bacteria. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 39(3):87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-023-03533-3
Mahadevan A (1984) AGRIS. In: Growth regulators, microorganisms and diseased plants, vol 31. Oxford and IBH Publishing Company, India, pp 363–460
Mohamadpoor M, Amini J, Ashengroph M, Azizi A (2022) Evaluation of biocontrol potential of Achromobacter xylosoxidans isolate CTA8689 against common bean root rot. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 117:101769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmpp.2021.101769
Moradali MF, Rehm BHA (2020) Bacterial biopolymers: from pathogenesis to advanced materials. Nat Rev Microbiol 18:195–210. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-019-0313-3
Murphy J, Riley JP (1962) A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Anal Chim Acta 27:31–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(00)88444-5
Nacoon S, Seemakram W, Ekprasert J, Jogloy S, Kuyper TW, Mongkolthanaruk W, Riddech N, Somdee T, Boonlue S (2022) Promoting growth and production of sunchoke (Helianthus tuberosus) by co-inoculation with phosphate solubilizing bacteria and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi under drought. Front Plant Sci 13:1022319. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.1022319
Naureen Z, Sham A, Al Ashram H, Gilani SA, Al Gheilani S, Mabood F, AbuQamar SF (2018) Effect of phosphate nutrition on growth, physiology and phosphate transporter expression of cucumber seedlings. Plant Physiol Biochem 127:211–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2018.03.028
Pantoja-Guerra M, Valero-Valero N, Ramírez CA (2023) Total auxin level in the soil–plant system as a modulating factor for the effectiveness of PGPR inocula: a review. Chem Biol Technol Agric 10(1):6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40538-022-00370-8
Pathania P, Rajta A, Singh PC, Bhatia R (2020) Role of plant growth-promoting bacteria in sustainable agriculture. Biocatal Agric Biotech 30:101842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2020.101842
Pohan SD, Silaban LM, Amrizal A, Puspitasari WD, Masni E (2019) The induction of root nodule and increasing of nitrogen content of common bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) by using Rhizobium plus fertilizer. In Proceedings SATREPS Conference 1 2(1):129–136
Romero-Perdomo F, Beltrán I, Mendoza-Labrador J, Estrada-Bonilla G, Bonilla R (2021) Phosphorus nutrition and growth of cotton plants inoculated with growth-promoting bacteria under low phosphate availability. Front Sustain Food Syst 4:618425. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2020.618425
Samal DK, Sukla LB (2022) Isolation and characterization of phosphate-solubilizing bacteria from rice field of Odisha and their growth promoting effect on agricultural-sectors. Geomicrobiol J 40(2):152–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490451.2022.2129882
Sanchez-Gonzalez ME, Mora-Herrera ME, Wong-Villarreal A, De La Portilla-López N, Sanchez-Paz L, Lugo J, Yañez-Ocampo G (2022) Effect of pH and carbon source on phosphate solubilization by bacterial isolates in Pikovskaya medium. Microorganisms 11(1):49. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11010049
Santana MM, Rosa AP, Zamarreño AM, García-Mina JM, Rai A, Cruz C (2022) Achromobacter xylosoxidans and Enteromorpha intestinalis extract improve tomato growth under salt stress. Agronomy 12(4):934. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12040934
Shirmohammadi E, Alikhani HA, Pourbabaei AA, Etesami H (2020) Improved phosphorus (P) uptake and yield of wheat fed with P fertilizer by drought tolerant phosphate–solubilizing fluorescent pseudomonads isolates: a field study in drylands. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 20:2195–2211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-020-00287-x
Suleman M, Yasmin S, Rasul M, Yahya M, Atta BM, Mirza MS (2018) Phosphate solubilizing bacteria with glucose dehydrogenase gene for phosphorus uptake and beneficial effects on wheat. PLoS One 13(9):e0204408. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204408
Sun N, Huang L, Zhao H, Zhang N, Lin X, Sun C (2022) Beneficial bacterium Azospirillum brasilense induces morphological, physiological and molecular adaptation to phosphorus deficiency in Arabidopsis . PCP 63(9):1273–1284. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcac101
Tan Z, Yang X, Gao J, Li Y, Gong B (2022) The mechanism of phosphate solubilizing of Pseudomonas sp. TC952 and its solubilizing process on TC removal. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30(10):26234–26243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23847-3
Tariq A, Ahmed A (2022b) Auxins interkingdom signaling molecules. In: Hano C (ed) Plant hormones: recent advances, new perspectives and applications. IntechOpen, London
Google Scholar
Tariq A, Ahmed A (2022a) Phosphate solubilizing Rhizobacteria as sustainable management strategy in agrobiology. In: Suratman MN, Azlin E Ariff RE (eds), Sustainable management of natural resources. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.108657
Wagi S, Ahmed A (2019) Bacillus spp.: potent microfactories of bacterial IAA. PeerJ 7:e7258. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.7258
Wang Y, Wang S, Yan X, Gao S, Man T, Yang Z, Wang P (2022) Preparation of liquid bacteria fertilizer with phosphate-solubilizing bacteria cultured by food wastewater and the promotion on the soil fertility and plants weight. J Clean Prod 370:133328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133328
Wu F, Li J, Chen Y, Zhang L, Zhang Y, Wang S, Liang J (2019) Effects of phosphate solubilizing bacteria on the growth, photosynthesis, and nutrient uptake of Camellia oleifera Abel. Forests 10(4):348. https://doi.org/10.3390/f10040348
Wu Y, Lu Q, Gong Y, Zhang Y, Xu Y, Cai M, Zhang Q (2023) Optimizing nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium fertilization levels for container plants of Lagerstroemia Indica ‘Whit III’based on the comprehensive quality evaluation. HortScience 58(2):222–230. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI16980-22
Wu Q, Wan W (2023) Insight into application of phosphate-solubilizing bacteria promoting phosphorus availability during chicken manure composting. Bioresour Technol 128707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2023.128707
Yadava P, Dayaman V, Agarwal A, Kumar K, Singh I, Verma R, Kaul T (2022) Fine-tuning the transcriptional regulatory model of adaptation response to phosphate stress in maize ( Zea mays L.). Physiol Mol Biol Plants 28(4):885–898. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-022-01155-x
Zeng Q, Wu X, Wang J, Ding X (2017) Phosphate solubilization and gene expression of phosphate-solubilizing bacterium Burkholderia multivorans WS-FJ9 under different levels of soluble phosphate. J Microbiol Biotechnol 27(4):844–855. https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.1611.11057
Download references
University of the Punjab, Quaid-e-Azam Campus, Lahore, Pakistan, is gratefully acknowledged for the accomplishment of the current research study.
The present study was funded by University of the Punjab, Quaid-e-Azam Campus, Lahore 54590, Pakistan.
Authors and affiliations.
Institute of Botany, University of the Punjab, Quaid-E-Azam Campus, Lahore, 54590, Pakistan
Aqsa Tariq & Ambreen Ahmed
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
AA and AT contributed to conceptualization of study; AA contributed to the formal analysis, investigation, funding acquisition, resources, and supervision. AT provided methodology and performed writing—original draft preparation, and writing—review and editing.
Correspondence to Ambreen Ahmed .
Ethical approval.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
The participants/authors have consented to the submission of this research paper to the journal.
The authors give their consent for the publication of all details to be published in this journal.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Responsible Editor: Gangrong Shi
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
Reprints and permissions
Tariq, A., Ahmed, A. Phosphate solubilization potential of PSB: an advance approach to enhance phosphorous availability for phytostimulation. Environ Sci Pollut Res (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-34934-y
Download citation
Received : 06 November 2023
Accepted : 04 September 2024
Published : 11 September 2024
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-34934-y
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
In addition, excess usage of chemical fertilizer in agriculture might also cause water pollution. Many researchers highlighted that plant able to uptake chemical fertilizer in the range 30% to 50% ...
Although the number of research papers focused on reducing the inputs of fertilizer through different PGPM inoculations has increased in recent years, there are few reports concerning the ...
Chemical fertilizers play a vital role in modern agriculture by providing essential nutrients to crops. The paper begins with an introduction to the significance of reviewing recent advancements ...
The employment of fertilizers not only increases crop productivity, but also alters soil physicochemical and biological properties. However, continuous utilization of chemical fertilizers is responsible for the decline of soil organic matter (SOM) content coupled with a decrease in the quality of agricultural soil.
The overuse of chemical fertilizers hardens the soil, reduces soil fertility, pollutes air, water, and soil, and lessens important nutrients of soil and minerals, thereby bringing hazards to ...
Finally, A3 cluster research dealing with techniques to control chemical pollutants in the environment connects previous research on the environmental impact of the application of chemical fertilizer (Cluster A1) and studies on strategic practices for reducing environmental impact of fertilizer pollutants while ensuring food security and ...
Chemical fertilizers are industrially manufactured and available in many formulations in markets. Fast-acting and low-cost, commercially available chemical fertilizers, are in solids (granular, crystalline, powder, and pills), slow-release spikes and pellets, liquids, and tablets (Table 1.2).Fertilizers mostly contain major nutrients (nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium) in a specific ratio.
For the chemical fertilizer, NPK fertilizer consisting of a mixture of the major components of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium (urea, 60 g/m 2; fused superphosphate, 140 g/m 2; potassium chloride, 30 g/m 2) was used. The organic manure and chemical fertilizer were applied 6 weeks after planting.
(1) Background and Aims: Manure is an important source of nutrients for plants, and organic substrate, as an effective soil amendment substrate, is a common material for maintaining soil health in the context of agricultural intensification. The use of organic fertilizers to meet the nutrient requirements of crops and to improve soil structure is a natural choice for sustainable agriculture ...
Chemical Fertilizers and Their Impact on Soil Health. Rashid, Bisma Nisar, and Azra N. Kamili1.1 IntroductionAgriculture is facing considerable problems such as low soil organic carbon (SOC) stock, low fertilizer use eficiencies, and t. e imbalance between nutrient removal and addition to the soil. The whole scenario of agriculture is at a ...
The results from this study indicated that the soil quality (organic matter content) was ameliorated by chemical and organic fertilizers, in particular commercial organic fertilizers, which caused a 9.35-16.35% increase in moisture content, a 11.56-18.72% increase in pH, a 1.73-2.15-fold increase in organic matter content, a 338.44-491. ...
The excessive use of chemical fertilizers, despite the high nutrients contents and ability to grow crops faster, discovered to be dangerous to the health and environment besides polluting the groundwater and atmosphere in the future. ... This review paper elucidates the recent updates of potential-biofertilizers in crop production due to an ...
It is evident from the statistical data set of published research papers in this area from major research publication houses that there is increasing interest in this field ... The chemical fertilizers are a class of synthetic compound substances produced specifically to maximize crop yield. These chemical fertilizers are "nitrogenous ...
Fertilization may affect the accumulation of heavy metals in soil and plant system. Plants absorb the fertilizers through the soil, they can enter the food chain. Thus, fertilization leads to water, soil and air pollution. The use of chemical fertilizers in Turkey is lower than developed and many developing countries.
We acknowledge funding by National Natural Science Foundation of China (41401324), Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest (201303103), and the Fundamental Research Funds ...
During recent high input farming systems and technologies, chemical fertilizers (consisting of N, P or K) are applied excessively to provide the plant nutrient requirement for increasing the agriculture productivity worldwide. However, only a limited amount (30-40%) of these nutrients is absorbed by the plants due to low fertilizer-use ...
It is noteworthy that chemical nutrients/fertilizers are producing half the agricultural productions of the whole world (Scholz and Geissler, 2018). According to the research of Khan et al. (2018), a balance dose of fertilizers is good enough for enhancing the production. The examples of inorganic or chemical fertilizers are nitrogen, phosphate ...
Sustainable agriculture is an important global issue. The use of organic fertilizers can enhance crop yield and soil properties while restraining pests and diseases. The objective of this study was to assess the effects of long-term use of chemical and organic fertilizers on tea and rhizosphere soil properties in tea orchards.
pply plants with these nutrients, chemical fertilizers are added to the soil. Application of chemical fertilizers, like nitrogen, phosphorus, and potass. um, are considered as the most beneficial way to provide nutrients to plants. Different chemical fertilizers usually enhanced the soil nutrient available and increase.
Studies have shown that chemical fertilizers do have a good yield-increasing effect on wheat, maize, peanuts, and other crops, but this increase will consume the long-term productivity of the soil ...
Over-dependence on chemical fertilizers, in terms of both cost and environmental impact, is not a viable strategy in the long run due to the costs involved in setting up fertilizer plants and maintaining production, both in terms of domestic resources and foreign exchange. ... This research received no external funding. The APC was funded by ...
Levels of one PFAS chemical in surface water exceeded 1,300 parts per trillion, they say in a lawsuit filed this year against Synagro, the company that supplied the fertilizer.
The research was conducted in Juwiring, Klaten, Central Java from August 2021 - March 2022 designed in a Completely Randomized Group Design with seven fertilizer combination treatments, namely ¼ ...
Sustainable agriculture is an important global issue. The use of organic fertilizers can enhance crop yield and soil properties while restraining pests and diseases. The objective of this study was to assess the effects of long-term use of chemical and organic fertilizers on tea and rhizosphere soil properties in tea orchards. Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) and high ...
Rhizosphere engineering approach is considered a quantum leap in plant sciences. The current study focused on investigating rhizobacterial efficiency to mobilize bioavailable phosphate from insoluble-phosphate source. Four efficient phosphate-solubilizing bacterial isolates, i.e., Pseudomonas songnenensis (GR3), Stutzerimonas stutzeri (HH2), Bacillus bingmayongensis (KH3), and Achromobacter ...